2.5.3.6. In a new paragraph for each requirement, describe the capability gaps or overlaps in terms of the difference between the initial objective values and the performance levels of capability solutions currently available to the joint force or in development. Identify those CRs for which there exist overlaps or redundancies, including considerations of existing or planned capabilities in other DoD Components; U.S. Government agencies or departments; and allied or partner nations. Assess whether the overlap is advisable for operational redundancy or if the overlap is a potential tradeoff to satisfy other identified capability gaps.

2.5.3.6.1. When describing “current capabilities” in the narrative paragraphs, Sponsors must consider all PORs and rapidly fielded capability solutions in the joint force.

2.5.3.6.1.1. Sponsors may not exclude viable capability solutions from the comparison because they are not the Sponsor’s preferred solution, or because they are developed and operated by another DoD Componnt.

2.5.3.6.1.2. Sponsors must ensure review of identified capability gaps by someone with visibility into capability solutions protected by higher classification levels.

2.5.3.6.1.3. If identified capability gaps would be different in light of capability solutions protected by higher classification levels, Sponsors may provide supplemental data in the form of a classified appendix as described at the end of the SW-ICD format guidance.

2.5.3.6.2. When describing a recapitalization (or “next generation”) situation, the “current capabilities” must consider the capability solution being replaced, as well as other viable solutions as noted above.

2.5.3.7. Clearly identify how each capability gap identified impacts the operational context in Section 1 of the SW-ICD, in terms of inability to execute part or all of an operational plan and/or unacceptable levels of operational risk. Where workarounds are feasible until the requirements proposed in the SW-ICD are satisfied by capability solutions, then identify the workarounds and operational risk(s) associated with them.